January 2, 2013
Best Songs of 2012

It’s already 2013, but I figured it was better late than never to release my favorite tunes of the past year. Lots of different genres and unique sounds, so hopefully you can find a favorite or be introduced to something new.

20. Waitin’ For You - Fetsum

19. Everyone Knows - Vacationer

18. Default - Django Django

17. Pilgrim - MØ

16. Dark Doo Wop - MS MR

15. Dissolve Me - Alt-J ∆

14.  Goldie - A$AP Rocky

13. Elephant - Tame Impala

12. Lost - Frank Ocean

11. Ache - Twigs

10. Hold On - Alabama Shakes

9. Lost in the Light - Bahamas

8. The Heart Pt. 3 - Kendrick Lamar

7. Open - Rhye

6. Adorn - Miguel

5. 40 Mark Strasse - The Shins

4. Same Love - Macklemore & Ryan Lewis

3. Jasmine - Jai Paul

2. Ungirthed - Purity Ring

1. Lay Your Cards Out - Poliça

December 23, 2012
Best Albums of 2012

Here are my top 20 albums of the past year. Music ranges from all kinds of genres, and I encourage you to check out the sample of each band/artist that made my list. Let me know what you think I got right, and what I missed too. (P.S. Be on the lookout for my top songs of 2012 list due out in the next few days. Made sure all of those were left off the samples below.) Thanks for listening. Enjoy!

20. Home Again - Michael Kiwanuka

Michael Kiwanuka “I’m Getting Ready” from Yours Truly on Vimeo.

19. Walk the Moon - Walk the Moon

WALK THE MOON “Anna Sun” OFFICIAL Music Video from Contrast Productions on Vimeo.

18. The Haunted Man - Bat for Lashes

Bat For Lashes - All Your Gold from thatgo on Vimeo.

17. Live from the Underground - Big K.R.I.T.

Big K.R.I.T. ft. 8Ball, MJG & 2 Chainz - Money On The Floor from Motion Family on Vimeo.

16. Swing Lo Magellan - Dirty Projectors

Dirty Projectors - Gun Has No Trigger from Record Store Day on Vimeo.

15. Port of Morrow - The Shins

The Shins - “Simple Song” from DANIELS on Vimeo.

14. Gone - Vacationer

Vacationer - Gone from Vacationer on Vimeo.

13. Body Faucet - Reptar

Reptar - Sebastian from Lucky Number Music on Vimeo.

12. Shields - Grizzly Bear

Grizzly Bear “Yet Again” [Official Video] from The Creators Project on Vimeo.

11. Devotion - Jessie Ware

Jessie Ware - Running from Gaborka on Vimeo.

10. My Head is an Animal - Of Monsters and Men

OF MONSTERS AND MEN “Little Talks” directed by WEWEREMONKEYS from Vision Film Co on Vimeo.

9. There’s No Leaving Now - The Tallest Man on Earth

The Tallest Man On Earth - Leading Me Now from Taylor Morgan on Vimeo.

8. Lonerism - Tame Impala

TAME IMPALA- Feels Like We Only Go Backwards from Becky & Joe on Vimeo.

7. An Awesome Wave - Alt-J

Alt-J “Breezeblocks” from Project Fathom on Vimeo.

6. Good Kid M.A.A.D. City - Kendrick Lamar

Kendrick Lamar “Swimming Pools” (Drank) from JeromeD.com on Vimeo.

5. Give You The Ghost - Poliça

Poliça “Dark Star” from Isaac Gale on Vimeo.

4. Boys & Girls - Alabama Shakes

Alabama Shakes - Hang Loose from HearYa.com on Vimeo.

3. channel ORANGE - Frank Ocean

frank ocean [pyramids] from christopher francis ocean on Vimeo.

2. Kaleidoscope Dream - Miguel

Miguel - The Thrill from Yours Truly on Vimeo.

1. Shrines - Purity Ring

“LOFTICRIES” | Purity Ring from AG Rojas on Vimeo.

November 4, 2012
An Honest Portrayal of the 2012 Election and the Fate of American Politics

I want to start by breaking down the irony of trying to post an “honest portrayal” of anything in politics without constantly questioning your own biases as the said honest portrayer. It’s an uphill battle from the first word and the trap of catering to at least some of your biases is unavoidable. But, biases, in the end, are expressed in an attempt to persuade readers to your viewpoint. In fact, we would be remiss to forget that the right answer is always going to fall under one side’s argument - no matter if you like it or not. With that said, here is my take on what this election means and what the aftermath dictates for the future of politics in this country.

This presidential election, amidst all the hoopla (from abortion, to Bain, to “you didn’t build that,” to the President’s underwhelming first debate, this list goes on forever), would always come down to the ultimate decision voters will make regarding the right path forward for government and the economy. There was, and still is, a fundamental choice amongst both of these candidates in terms of economic plans. 

The Romney Plan relies on lowering taxes for everyone and assumes the wealthiest - the “job creators” - will use that extra money to hire more people, thus boosting the economy. The problem with this assumption is that it relies upon a massive (and I mean massive) boost in the economy to fill in the gaping hole left behind in government revenue. The simple response of the Republican Party, which has now shifted off the scale to cater toward extremists views shared by few (i.e. the Tea Party), is that a government with less revenue is one with less to do, and is thus the ideal state of government in the GOP’s eyes. This is a problem far overlooked by a party and its base that thinks they are seeking a future with more freedom and individualism, but is actually seeking selfish motives that forget the beneficial role government plays in their lives every day. Government revenue is brought in through taxes, and if you continue to lower taxes then you continue to lower funding for programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Education, Veterans Benefits, and countless more. Mitt Romney chooses this path of cutting funding for these essential programs, and on top of it he plans to raise spending on Defense (one of the few programs that certainly doesn’t need more funding, and the Joint Chiefs have said this themselves). This, to me, is counter-intuitive to common sense. Why would we ever cut funding needed to pay for the vital programs that are pillars to American Exceptionalism? The Republican viewpoint is that this is fine. We should leaves these matters to the private sector and thus leave money in peoples’ pockets. I find this notion ridiculous because never have I seen a private business put people before profits. The end result is larger costs for the middle class, who will see things like their health, their education, their retirement, all held hostage by the bottom line of private industry.

President Obama’s plan is to raise taxes on the wealthiest, who have sat on record low taxes the past 12 years. In that time period the wealthiest have not even been bruised by the economy, and the distribution of income has shifted enormously toward the top. At the same time, the middle class has been laid off by the thousands and has seen their share of income plummet. There is nothing more unpatriotic and selfish then to look at this situation and say lets continue to lower taxes for the top 1%. And, because everyone else’s taxes get lowered too, we will magically close that income divide. A more logical plan is to raise taxes for those unscathed by the recession, raise taxes on businesses sitting on record-high profits, and then use that added revenue to rebuild the middle class. This will allow government, which has no profit motive besides helping the American people, to make investments in the middle class. The President understands the common sense notion that the middle class has the purchasing power to ignite a cycle of economic activity. The cycle goes as follows:

1. Tax the rich for their fair share

2. Reinvest that revenue into the middle class

3. Watch that largest sector of our economy start to buy things again

4. Watch businesses start to hire to keep up with demand

5. Watch businesses continue to see record-high profits

6. Watch the wealthy expand their wealth off investments that pay off from successful     companies.

Nobody loses in this cycle.

The President does not stop at the thought that simply relying on more tax revenue from the wealthy will solve all of our problems. There is a realization that our entitlement programs (Medicare, Social Security) have a possibility of going bankrupt. The President has fully recognized this scenario and has attempted to work with Congress toward finding a real solution. I am not saying he has simply been stymied by a Republican stalwart in the House and Senate, but there is a need for real leaders across the spectrum. Politicians who are statesman first and put the betterment of the country before ideological grandstanding. This plan is not even a figment of the Romney platform because the massive defunding caused by lowering taxes will result in entitlements becoming obsolete (i.e. the voucherization of Medicare and the privatization of Social Security).

In conclusion, an election that started out as a referendum on the President will end as a referendum on the current state of the Republican Party. Right now, the American people have an opportunity to condemn the recent polarization of politics. You have a chance to condemn a Republican Party that seeks to conform all of society to their religious beliefs.  You have the chance to condemn a Republican Party that held the country hostage to lowering the deficit. You have the chance to condemn a Republican Party that obtained their ransom for holding the country hostage, then failed to compromise on a bipartisan solution toward becoming more fiscally responsible. Finally, you have the opportunity to condemn a Republican Party that made agenda item number one, firing Barack Obama instead of helping the middle class. If you have any call to change your mind in the next couple days, this should be the reason.

I do not think that Democrats or Democratic Control is the ‘be-all and end-all’ solution to all of our country’s problems. I do believe that the current ideological platform of the Republican Party is part of our problem. Government is never at its best when run from the extremes or run from solely one side’s viewpoints. Most issues have middle ground, and I can only assume that the more politicians we elect from the middle, the more room there is for understanding and compromise. Ultimately, the American people have conveyed that they simply want things to get done. All I want is more debate. An ideal society should be one that learns from each other and continuously progresses through sometimes accepting the other side’s view as right.

In the end, no matter what party you hold your patronage to, go out and vote with a conscience. Beyond ideology, there are some real reasons to choose one side over the other. Society is attempting to tilt to the far-right views of a few that are reinforced by power motives from an echo chamber in conservative media. We must re-obtain the influence of moderate viewpoints to guide our political dialogue and place an emphasis on finding common ground. I, for one, have a lot of faith in my generation and believe there is an opportunity to re-champion a society that works together instead of competing alone. But first, we have to go out and vote ourselves. Government only responds to its demographics that have the most influence - this is the nature of politics. Conversely, a democratic society creates the opportunity for everyone to be heard, if they stand up and choose to be heard. We can change the course of this nation with our voices, but strength is only found in numbers, and decisions are only made by those that show up.

There’s a reason this day only comes around every four years. It’s the election stupid, get out and vote!

October 4, 2012
What has Obama done? Save your integrity and stop playing dumb with the facts.

He Saved the auto industry, which is producing at some of its greatest rates ever and with more focus on innovation.

He Stabilized a financial collapse that was the worst seen since the great depression, and has already collected all of the taxpayer money from bailing the banks out.

He has Reformed schools in 48 states with his Race to the Top initiative.

And, he has fostered 30 straight months of private sector job growth.

Things that could be done if a Republican House had other motives besides making Obama a one-term president….

He has proposed an American Jobs Act, which wants to invest millions of dollars into rebuilding our infrastructure to compete with fast-growing countries around the world. Thus, creating more jobs through expanding lagging industries, and developing new industries to win the future.

He has proposed refinancing the mortgage industry, flipping the debt on people who are underwater and allowing them to be active consumers in the economy again. The housing collapse is thought to be the root of our economic stagnation as it still continues. What is needed is an influx of cash to the middle class to reduce their personal debt on their mortgages. This, coupled with the Fed’s maintained low interest rates, is the answer to boosting home purchases, and expanding the amount of economic activity by the middle class.

Lastly, he has proposed a $4 trillion deficit-reduction plan that, just like Simpson-Bowles, relies on the theory of reducing our debt through raising revenue and cutting spending together. That revenue is raised by asking the wealthy to carry a more equal burden in the taxes they pay. This allows re-investment of revenues into policies that expand the middle class and create economic growth. It also cuts spending to reduce over-funding of certain programs, while eliminating programs deemed unnecessary. What it does not do, is cut spending to programs that help the middle class - a measure that would continue to set back our country’s economic engine.

May 18, 2012
Robert Reich: How Odd that Mitt's Smitten With Clinton

robertreich:

Mitt Romney is full of praise for Bill Clinton even as he heaps scorn on Obama.

“Almost a generation ago, Bill Clinton announced that the era of big government was over,” says Romney, “Clinton was signaling to his own party that Democrats should no longer try to govern by proposing a new program…

December 19, 2011

Best Albums/Mixtapes of 2011

(Source: 8tracks.com)

June 30, 2011
I read an op-ed by David Brooks in the New York Times the other day that defined the management style of President Obama. It was a very intriguing take on how our president goes about his business of finding solutions and visualizing legislation. Most importantly, it swooped me out of the black hole that is the media’s growing depiction of President Obama’s inability to lead our country. Brooks points out that it does seem as though our president has disappeared from the limelight when it comes to negotiating the lowering of our debt - and this seems far from the personality of the man who outspokenly campaigned in ‘08 and is known for coming off as cocky - but in reality this is the management style that has come to be for President Obama. He sits back and consumes all facets of an issue or policy debate and intervenes when he feels the time is right - after all it is Congress that makes the laws (although most of the time they can’t even accomplish this).
I agree with Brooks’ perspective that this is not an entirely horrible way to lead - and that it does in fact allow us to scale back from the lofty standards President Kennedy misled us to believe were attainable. Brooks goes on to encourage the president to finally step into the debt talks and exercise his passive management style of negotiating with Republicans. But, today, the president did the exact opposite and came out as the assertive party leader that was going to fight for the Democratic plan to lower the debt. He stepped into the ring swinging by stating that he would not back down from raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans (alright, he didn’t exactly state it so candidly, but you knew he meant business). It was an agressive leadership tactic that we had not seen from President Obama in quite some time, and it was great use of the bully pulpit to remind voters of the Republican ultimatum - cut spending on vital programs utilized by the middle class, leave the wealthy and their (barrels of) money alone, and then we will raise the debt limit.
This has become a debate that is being treated like a game in Washington, but most Americans will tell you their economic future is far from something to play around with. President Obama is finally stepping in as the adult in a situation that has been handled childishly by the Republican Leadership. There is no such thing as “cutting to prosperity,” and if we are going to fix our $14 trillion dollar national debt, we are going to do it by cutting waste and eliminating tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations. If the Republicans cannot arrive at this compromise, then they can pull an Eric Cantor and simply walk away from the American people when a solution needs to be found.
If you went around and asked middle class America what they thought was the best answer to solving our debt and putting people to back to work, how would they respond? Would they say that sending their taxpayer money to corporations via low taxes and letting it “trickle down” to create jobs is the route to go? Or would they prefer that money go directly to job growth initiatives and programs that immediately help to lower unemployment? My bet is on the latter, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the majority of American people were in the same boat.
This is a time when all voters need to sit back and ask themselves a simple question that can be applied to many different scenarios: At what point do we stop funding the hedge fund manager’s third house, and start funding the college scholarship of a promising student? President Obama did an exceptional job of clarifying this today, and it is clear we have a man who is determined to find the best answer to decreasing our debt - not just a band of puppets settled on pandering to their party base with an election coming near.

I read an op-ed by David Brooks in the New York Times the other day that defined the management style of President Obama. It was a very intriguing take on how our president goes about his business of finding solutions and visualizing legislation. Most importantly, it swooped me out of the black hole that is the media’s growing depiction of President Obama’s inability to lead our country. Brooks points out that it does seem as though our president has disappeared from the limelight when it comes to negotiating the lowering of our debt - and this seems far from the personality of the man who outspokenly campaigned in ‘08 and is known for coming off as cocky - but in reality this is the management style that has come to be for President Obama. He sits back and consumes all facets of an issue or policy debate and intervenes when he feels the time is right - after all it is Congress that makes the laws (although most of the time they can’t even accomplish this).

I agree with Brooks’ perspective that this is not an entirely horrible way to lead - and that it does in fact allow us to scale back from the lofty standards President Kennedy misled us to believe were attainable. Brooks goes on to encourage the president to finally step into the debt talks and exercise his passive management style of negotiating with Republicans. But, today, the president did the exact opposite and came out as the assertive party leader that was going to fight for the Democratic plan to lower the debt. He stepped into the ring swinging by stating that he would not back down from raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans (alright, he didn’t exactly state it so candidly, but you knew he meant business). It was an agressive leadership tactic that we had not seen from President Obama in quite some time, and it was great use of the bully pulpit to remind voters of the Republican ultimatum - cut spending on vital programs utilized by the middle class, leave the wealthy and their (barrels of) money alone, and then we will raise the debt limit.

This has become a debate that is being treated like a game in Washington, but most Americans will tell you their economic future is far from something to play around with. President Obama is finally stepping in as the adult in a situation that has been handled childishly by the Republican Leadership. There is no such thing as “cutting to prosperity,” and if we are going to fix our $14 trillion dollar national debt, we are going to do it by cutting waste and eliminating tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations. If the Republicans cannot arrive at this compromise, then they can pull an Eric Cantor and simply walk away from the American people when a solution needs to be found.

If you went around and asked middle class America what they thought was the best answer to solving our debt and putting people to back to work, how would they respond? Would they say that sending their taxpayer money to corporations via low taxes and letting it “trickle down” to create jobs is the route to go? Or would they prefer that money go directly to job growth initiatives and programs that immediately help to lower unemployment? My bet is on the latter, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the majority of American people were in the same boat.

This is a time when all voters need to sit back and ask themselves a simple question that can be applied to many different scenarios: At what point do we stop funding the hedge fund manager’s third house, and start funding the college scholarship of a promising student? President Obama did an exceptional job of clarifying this today, and it is clear we have a man who is determined to find the best answer to decreasing our debt - not just a band of puppets settled on pandering to their party base with an election coming near.

June 27, 2011
The next best thing to step foot in the twin cities. He may well be the savior of Minnesota sports and our dismal past decade. But hey, the dark days are over. I don’t expect the world from Williams, but I do think he is the prototype of what the NBA game has transformed into - up and down talents with freakish potential, sky-high verticals, and exceptionally versatile skills for their height. I left the NBA in the early 2000s because it was, plain and simple, not fun to watch anymore. It has started to regain my interest with the recent influx of young talent allowed to showcase their abilities on a nightly basis. The pace has picked up with similarities to the college game, and we are seeing these younger teams, like OKC, display a new winning formula. Derrick Williams has the ability to be a cornerstone that leads the Timberwolves to a promising future. The re-defined Wolves can now truly turn the corner and embark on the post-Garnett era. So, despite the jokes cracked upon the Timberwolves in recent years and up until this present day, I actually think they have put together a quality team that can contend in the next couple years, and maybe even this year (Yeah, I had trouble spitting that out too. Just say it a couple times and look at their roster and it becomes a little easier). With guys like Love, Rubio, Beasley, Webster, Wes Johnson, Anthony Randolph, and a promising leader in Derrick Williams - the potential is limitless. Granted, as many are pointing out, the team becomes a little redundant, but I say we let it play out. With this much talent, I really don’t see how this years TWolves can disappoint. The only place left to go is up….
(And yeah, that’s your #1 pick Kyrie Irving admiring in the backdrop)

The next best thing to step foot in the twin cities. He may well be the savior of Minnesota sports and our dismal past decade. But hey, the dark days are over. I don’t expect the world from Williams, but I do think he is the prototype of what the NBA game has transformed into - up and down talents with freakish potential, sky-high verticals, and exceptionally versatile skills for their height. I left the NBA in the early 2000s because it was, plain and simple, not fun to watch anymore. It has started to regain my interest with the recent influx of young talent allowed to showcase their abilities on a nightly basis. The pace has picked up with similarities to the college game, and we are seeing these younger teams, like OKC, display a new winning formula. Derrick Williams has the ability to be a cornerstone that leads the Timberwolves to a promising future. The re-defined Wolves can now truly turn the corner and embark on the post-Garnett era. So, despite the jokes cracked upon the Timberwolves in recent years and up until this present day, I actually think they have put together a quality team that can contend in the next couple years, and maybe even this year (Yeah, I had trouble spitting that out too. Just say it a couple times and look at their roster and it becomes a little easier). With guys like Love, Rubio, Beasley, Webster, Wes Johnson, Anthony Randolph, and a promising leader in Derrick Williams - the potential is limitless. Granted, as many are pointing out, the team becomes a little redundant, but I say we let it play out. With this much talent, I really don’t see how this years TWolves can disappoint. The only place left to go is up….

(And yeah, that’s your #1 pick Kyrie Irving admiring in the backdrop)

June 16, 2011
Just bought these New Basketball shoes online. Can’t wait to improve my game with these kicks. SWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAG

Just bought these New Basketball shoes online. Can’t wait to improve my game with these kicks. SWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAG

June 3, 2011
Now that I have thought about it for a day, I think I will really miss Shaquille O’Neal in the NBA - and the NBA will surely miss him. I like how ESPN analyst Mike Wilbon defined his retirement yesterday by saying that Shaq and MJ were the 2 most exciting basketball players of the current era - the era following the years that brought us Magic and Larry (sadly I was not around for a time when the NBA seems like it was more watchable than it is now). I wholeheartedly agree with Wilbon, and believe Shaq’s character and stature on the court will sorely be missed. It is not often you get to see a 7 foot, 300 pound kid enter the NBA out of college and dominate with the talent Shaq displayed. When you sit back and think how athletic this big man was for his size, it truly is amazing. There will never be another Shaq. I have to add too, that the first encounter where I really understood who Shaq was, had to be Kazaam. One of my favorite childhood movies, and I believe it is a testament to the great icon that Shaquille O’Neal was and always will be.

Now that I have thought about it for a day, I think I will really miss Shaquille O’Neal in the NBA - and the NBA will surely miss him. I like how ESPN analyst Mike Wilbon defined his retirement yesterday by saying that Shaq and MJ were the 2 most exciting basketball players of the current era - the era following the years that brought us Magic and Larry (sadly I was not around for a time when the NBA seems like it was more watchable than it is now). I wholeheartedly agree with Wilbon, and believe Shaq’s character and stature on the court will sorely be missed. It is not often you get to see a 7 foot, 300 pound kid enter the NBA out of college and dominate with the talent Shaq displayed. When you sit back and think how athletic this big man was for his size, it truly is amazing. There will never be another Shaq. I have to add too, that the first encounter where I really understood who Shaq was, had to be Kazaam. One of my favorite childhood movies, and I believe it is a testament to the great icon that Shaquille O’Neal was and always will be.

May 30, 2011
New Blog Post - Punditry in Motion

May 30, 2011

Frank Ocean and OFWGKTA are taking over. Goodbye to the old hip-hop scene, Golf Wang is the (odd)Future. SWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAGSWAG

May 29, 2011
How much longer are we really going to let this conversation carry on? Michael vs. LeBron? Are you kidding me? I’m not even going to bring up stats because if you want to go that route, I don’t think LeBron even warrants a spot in the top 10 (maybe not even top 20). Next stop is probably the trophy case, and we all know that James should no longer even be mentioned in this category until he wins at least 1! I can agree that LeBron has potential, but he is a physical specimen that is incomparable to any other athlete in basketball (and actually probably on the face of this Earth). So with all this potential, he should have done something more than win an MVP and a scoring title at this point. He should have a ring, but he doesn’t. Simply put, there are ways as a great basketball player to make those around you, not play better individually, but as a team. Michael had that gift, and LeBron doesn’t. James will etch his name on the all-time lists when he’s done, but never should his name be put in the same conversation as MJ’s again. Scottie’s just jealous he wasn’t as good as either one.

How much longer are we really going to let this conversation carry on? Michael vs. LeBron? Are you kidding me? I’m not even going to bring up stats because if you want to go that route, I don’t think LeBron even warrants a spot in the top 10 (maybe not even top 20). Next stop is probably the trophy case, and we all know that James should no longer even be mentioned in this category until he wins at least 1! I can agree that LeBron has potential, but he is a physical specimen that is incomparable to any other athlete in basketball (and actually probably on the face of this Earth). So with all this potential, he should have done something more than win an MVP and a scoring title at this point. He should have a ring, but he doesn’t. Simply put, there are ways as a great basketball player to make those around you, not play better individually, but as a team. Michael had that gift, and LeBron doesn’t. James will etch his name on the all-time lists when he’s done, but never should his name be put in the same conversation as MJ’s again. Scottie’s just jealous he wasn’t as good as either one.

May 28, 2011
I want this picture framed and on my wall!!!!

I want this picture framed and on my wall!!!!

May 28, 2011

RIP Gil Scott-Heron - A social activist and revolutionary that led with his voice and peace of mind.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »